RE: CAMS Stuff - Who wants to help with the protocol? |
||
![]() Ret. CinC Chawmp I regret that I expect to be too busy irl, from about now, to be able to participate in such a project any longer. But I will follow the development of the project, and offer any suggestions I have :) Can I recommend taking advantage of OSI's CVS hosting (I'm not sure if this is totally un and running yet, but it should definately be the first place to call), and a good way to help to promote OSI as well as CAMS. On 2002-09-12 21:17:30, parad0x wrote >So, CA is back up. No time to procrastinate anymore. No reason to anyways, we have a site again. > >CAMS had some steam awhile back, but now we need to get that ball rolling again. It's a big project and if we want it to go anywhere, we need to do something about it. > >So, I need to know, who wants to help set the protocol for the CAMS transactions. You don't need to be a networking genius or a spec ops member to specify, don't worry. However, you should have a general idea what a network protocol should be like. If you don't know right now but think you can get ready, then that's fine. > >I'll basically be setting up a CVS server we'll use to track this project, and I'm shortly going to re-enable my brigade and get things working. The brigade itself might move (spec ops has very restrictive membership rules), but I will make sure people who want to be on this project have that opportunity (within reason). > >CAMS is going to include: >- A challenge based authentication system >- A flexible protocol (versioning so we can upgrade it gracefully) >- Several modes >- Low overhead > > >CAMS _may_ have: >- A server based architecture >- Strong crypto support >- Puggable protocol support >- Broadcast messages by group. > >So. You can email: >dfayra00@umail.ucsb.edu > >With the string "CAMS:" at the start of the subject. ANY EMAILS WITHOUT THIS LINE WILL BE IGNORED! Please make my mail-filing life easy or I will ne a nazi about letting you in :) Replies:
|
||
| CyberArmy::Forum v0.6 Generated In 0.01216 seconds |