So what's your plan? |
||
 Ker sefo You are going to change the mission statement and what? Think up some strategies to keep new members, get them to edit library articles? You are wasting your time and members' by repeating mistakes done by previous staff and other decision makers. These are not the changes people are waiting for. They don't care at all about it and are not going to make even a minimal effort to achieve it. (it's been like this for years) The only things that ever worked for this community were the challenges, IRC and games. Articles and projects have been a disaster. Why do you want to insist on it? 1- Just keep a rss feed of famous sites on the main page and be done with it. 2- For projects you link to the job section of sourceforge and others. 3- Mission statement = Community of old school hackers that have entered the web2.0 era and got 0nwd. You can still come and play with us on IRC and forums or try to own our challenge. 4- Put your effort in challenges, games, irc games. Have some counter strike or warcraft tournaments, make some simple brain challenge on IRC like int16h did with the brainfuck thing...etc. 5- reset ALL ranks except admin and cinc. 6- add 4+ ranks 7- base ranks on games and challenges 8- develop and reorganise forums 9- add some simple userspace, blog thing Asking people to work for you never works. (especially if there's no work like it's the case now) On 2008-08-26 06:06:37, knoledgesponge wrote >So do what you want, while we do what we want. There are a few of us, and I repeat...only a few who are not quite finished with this 'game'. > >I myself do not have enough online time, dopel seems to have given up repeating the same things over and over, Frisp is getting married, SAJChurchey is busy. Icydemon doesn't even reply to my mail, he is part of staff and my X/O. > >The simple fact is that none of us can carry CA alone, and it is when we feel like we are people start burning out all the quicker. > >You are right, there are many changes needing to be implemented...but what I am worried about is not such aesthetics, but rather activity levels. The whole reason the brigade restructure was originally proposed was to increase transparency, member mobility and most importantly member retention. > >People have forgotten that. > >I just have a hard time saying "well that's that, the party is over. Time to go home guys" and just let the hangover be the only memory. > >Yes, something needs to be done with the library, but the only thing really lacking is someone editing the articles. Yes CIS can be renamed R&D, and absorb some other projects but what will that do to change activity levels(besides making structure more intuitive)? > >Not to sound egotistical, but CSAP is the most active brigade, but it is difficult to keep people motivated...but for anyone who has been in a 'command' position before knows, it has always been like that. We have just always had such a large buffer which allowed us to cheat reports and fake things. > >Now, there is nowhere to hide, and no carpet to sweep the dust under. > >So if anyone wishes to start a project, or participate in a project then please feel free to. If you just want to hang out on IRC, chat on the forums then that is fine as well. > >-sp0nge > > Replies:
|
||
| CyberArmy::Forum v0.6 Generated In 0.01212 seconds |
2008-10-19 11:59:35
2008-10-01 17:28:18
2008-08-25 19:52:33
2008-08-26 09:27:54
2008-08-26 12:26:19
2008-08-13 21:42:36
2008-08-07 10:40:50