RE: D [more?] |
||
![]() ![]() Delta LtKer int16h Great post! :) I should've had you write half of this poll >_< And yes, I agree with you :) <3 On 2007-11-19 00:10:25, ion6ix wrote >The answer I was looking for wasn't one of the predefined choices... > >I'm not one to be pigeonholed. What CA was 7-8 years ago, when I first came here, was of course much different from what it is today. But then again, I myself am much different than I was then, as I'm sure we all are. > >CA seems to have always been in a state of trying to define itself, and it never seems to have made up it's collective mind. The best thing to do is not define anything. "CyberArmy is an independent union of Internet users for a self-regulated Internet." I think that simple statement best describes it. Let that mean to you whatever you want it to. If you want to be a 'GNU Hippy' or a 'Black Hat Cracker' then so be it. What you're looking to do with your skills and knowledge is probably not the same as me or the next person. CA should stand for the common goal of education, englightenment, and self-empowerment that we are all looking for. The internet is a dangerous place...to be a 'good guy' or a 'bad guy' is up to you. CA shouldn't pick a side. It should remain a neutral organization that serves for knowledge for it's own sake. As an Army, the act of choosing a side automatically implies an inheirited set of enemies, and will alienate a certain percentage of the existing user base. We don't want/need that. > >Think about it from above. >
Replies:
|
||
| CyberArmy::Forum v0.6 Generated In 0.06083 seconds |