RE: IRCD/Portfowarding |
||
 Ret. CinC Chawmp It is possible, if you configure the router to forward the packets, leaving source address intact .. you can do this easily enough with iptables and ipfw, for example, but I don't know enough about routing in NT. Any software though that just accepts the connection and opens another to the ircd, forwarding the packets between the two, won't give the results you're looking for. On 2003-01-05 01:04:43, XCoyote wrote >The recent thread reminded me about a problem I have myself, although it's not necessary, it would help me in the future, from running my ircd on my gateway > >the problem is this, I have a thirdparty portfowarder enabled on my 2k box ( my gateway for now ) and my slackware box is running an ircd, now anyone that connects via my gateway to the ircd, basically is a clone of everyone else ( the entail the ip addy of my gateway ) is there anyway around this? > > >If you don't understand what i'm talking about ( and i dno't blame you, neither do I :P ) here's an example: > >Gateway 223.150.152.1 (net ip == 211.16.25.12 ----- Slack 223.150.152.2 ( running Ircd) > >now anyone that connects to my ircd, holds the gateways net ip. > >=\ > >So what do I need? Is the portfowarded just shit... ? or do I need to set routing or something.. ? > >Any idea's appreciated :) I mean it would be nice to be able to ban an ip range, without banning my gateway , and everyone else on the network for that matter :D > > > >Major XCoyote >Specops > >Contact me > > > "1 Death is a tragedy, a thousand deaths is a statistic..." >-stalin > > >  Ret. CinC Chawmp
The CyberArmy
Replies:
|
||
| CyberArmy::Forum v0.6 Generated In 0.01565 seconds |
2003-01-05 01:04:43